Evolution is the method of natural development. Whether a dog or perhaps a car, we’re permanently trying to enhance on the prior model. Most progress is gradual, interrupted once in a while by a major breakthrough, like walking on two legs or ABS brakes.
Just how is it that the people, which is actually the top of food chain, still needs the best section of annually when having a baby? Especially when you consider that we usually only produce one, rather than a litter, aside from eggs by the hundreds. Haven’t we advanced sufficiently by the 21st century to be able to cut this down to less than 6 months?
Evidently we’ve not, which raises the question, you will want to? It will be easy to place the blame on the women. Pregnancy is their job after all. But since they got this all-important role since the men couldn’t be trusted with it, we’re hardly capable to point the finger.
So what’s the answer? There can actually only be one logical conclusion. Pregnancy and childbirth take nine months because that’s just how long people need to select a name. Let’s face it. Other species of animals obtain the birth process over with considerably quicker because they do not even bother, unless they’re a Disney character.
Our history has shown us that it can take quite a long time to develop a sensible name, so a child may as well stay in the womb until we do. In fact, there are numerous examples that suggest nine months still isn’t long enough and we have to extend it to a year. Just look at all the children inventively called Junior, or Bob Smith III. It’s an admission that if three-quarters of annually, this is the best they could manage.
The initial hurdle is relatives. This is specially true for younger parents, who are apt to have more of these alive, most of whom desire to be immortalized by their grandchild inheriting their name. So unless you’re having quadruplets, you’ve got a problem حوامل.You can’t even get away with giving your son or daughter all four names, because only you can come first and top billing counts for everything. Next is the problem of the particular names grandparents have a tendency to have. It appears children’s names were a low priority when confronted with the industrial revolution and the odd World War. Who would like to end up calling their child Algernon or Gertrude?
The following problem is the wife’s side of the family. Whether or not a female took her husband’s name in matrimony, she will most likely want her family name to survive, so it becomes a child’s middle name, even if it isn’t one at all. Just ask Mary Carbunkle Jones.
The sole exception is if these people are extremely rich. If calling your daughter Ethelred Stinkpants Smith puts her to the the top of inheritance heap, then so be it.
Next comes the problem of pets. Not naming them, as that’s easy and they do not care anyway. The sole principle is to remember that maybe you are in the park one day shouting at your puppy, so names like “Fatty” and “Loser” are not good choices.
The problem is that you can’t name your son or daughter following a pet. You might such as the name Max, but when an uncle had a Doberman called Max, it’s just not planning to happen. Charlie is a great choice for either gender — except if someone had a cat of exactly the same designation that got run over. It’s as though by choosing that name, you’re condemning your son or daughter to a fate of jumping out of a screen, chasing a bird and getting hit by a truck.
If anything, choosing a title should be easier now. These days, almost anything is acceptable. If you can’t find a real name you like, then how about circumstances, a country or perhaps a continent? A food-group will do. But regardless of the infinite choice, it’s amazing how many parents mess up. They don’t really think what sort of child’s name could be changed, shortened or generally twisted into something that will scar their psyche for life. How hard was school for the kind of Jeremy Attric, Philip Ness and Frank Ukwit? Who knows, perhaps if he hadn’t been called Adolf, things could have been different.